A week of Instagram carousels in just a few clicks.

Hook.

Stay until the end and I'll tell you exactly what one of these would sell for at auction today. Eight. That's all that exist. Eight 1969 Trans Am Convertibles, ever built, on the entire planet.

Body.

Pontiac built each one with a Ram Air III 400 H.O. under the hood, painted Cameo Ivory, and dressed with those unmistakable Tyrol Blue racing stripes. They were basically hand-finished factory racers that accidentally came with a soft top. Production stopped at eight because the convertible body couldn't handle the stresses of the Trans Am suspension package without serious chassis reinforcement, and Pontiac pulled the plug mid-run rather than compromise the car. Of the eight produced, fewer than half are confirmed survivors today, and the paper trail on each one reads like a detective novel. Two have changed hands privately with no public record. One sat in a barn in Ohio for over two decades before a collector tracked it down through build sheet research. Now here is the number you stayed for: a documented, numbers-matching example last crossed the block at over two million dollars, putting it ahead of a first-year Hemi Cuda convertible in collector value. For context, a 1970 Boss 429 Mustang, which most people would call a unicorn, exists in roughly four thousand units. That is the distance between rare and unrepeatable.

Call to action.

Drop in the comments which survivor story you want the full deep dive on.

On-screen text.

• 01Only 8 ever built
• 02Ram Air III 400 H.O.
• 03Cameo Ivory + Tyrol Blue stripes
• 04Production halted mid-run
• 05Confirmed survivors: fewer than 4
• 06Auction result: $2M+

Hook.

5,668 books were banned in the U.S. last year. So I picked one and actually read it. Is it dangerous, or is it the kind of book someone didn't want you to find?

Body.

The book is "The Hate U Give" by Angie Thomas. It was challenged in school districts across multiple states. The reason given was "pervasive vulgarity" and content deemed "anti-police." What it's actually about is a sixteen-year-old girl who watches her childhood friend get shot and then has to decide whether to speak up. It's about code-switching between two worlds, about grief, about who gets to be believed. I finished it in two sittings and cried at a part I genuinely did not see coming. There is nothing in this book that a teenager hasn't already lived, seen on the news, or felt quietly alone. The people who filed to ban it cited language. What I think they were actually afraid of was the empathy it builds. Specifically, empathy for a perspective they'd rather keep invisible. So here's my answer: not dangerous. The most alive, necessary kind of reading. The kind that only gets more important when someone tries to take it away.

Call to action.

Comment the last banned book you read, or the one you're picking up next.

On-screen text.

• 015,668 books banned in one year
• 02The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas
• 03Official reason: 'pervasive vulgarity'
• 04What it's ACTUALLY about
• 05Finished it in 2 sittings
• 06Dangerous? Or necessary?

Hook.

A 23-year-old solved a math problem that stumped the world for 64 years. The whole thing took 80 minutes with an AI chatbot.

Body.

The problem was an Erdős conjecture: a notoriously hard unsolved question about number sequences that Paul Erdős himself put a bounty on decades ago. Most people heard "AI solved a math problem" and either panicked or called it hype. Both reactions missed the actual story. The model didn't invent a new technique. It took a known formula from a completely separate area of math and applied it to this problem, a connection no human researcher had made in 64 years. The researcher, Abdulrahman Alagil, posted the full chat log publicly. You can read every prompt, every correction, every dead end. What you see isn't a machine conjuring genius. It's a human who knew exactly what question to ask, steering a model that could search mathematical space faster than any single person. The AI was the instrument. The insight was knowing which instrument to pick up. That's the real signal here: AI isn't replacing mathematicians. It's collapsing the time between "I have an idea" and "I have a proof."

Call to action.

Drop a comment: do you think AI is a research tool or a research threat?

On-screen text.

• 0164-year-old unsolved math problem
• 02Solved in 80 minutes
• 03The model used a KNOWN formula
• 04Applied where no one had tried
• 05Full chat log is public
• 06Tool, not replacement